Research Assignment 2

/in /by

Research Assignment 2

Students this is your second research assignment. There are multiple components to this assignment. It is optional whether you work as a group or not but it needs to be submitted as your work. You will submit assignment through EMAIL.

*Part 1-Who, What, When Where Aspects, similar to first assignment, time and setting specific to this assignment, as specific as possible.

*Part 2-Min. Half Page, Max. One Page, Typed Outline of Work(s) that make up your sources. Outline headings can be 14 pt. font, Subheadings and details no more than 12 pt. font, descending outline explaining the larger aspects of the work. It is to be single-spaced, Only for the outline. This will show that you have read your source and competent enough to explain what is located in it. More details on how to do an outline will be given in class.

Part 3-Thesis/Main Idea, My Interpretation Section- 1.5 Page Minimum (Max 3)-Explaining what the author is getting at, how does he or she address their main idea, and how their thesis helps give better clarity for you on the subject matter. Your interpretation then takes that clarification a step further in giving your thoughts, shaped around the evidence from the text. Those with multiple sources have more than one author but your interpretation can fit as a continuation of the sources. Keep in mind interpretations are yours but it must include good, solid evidence from your source(s).

NOTE: The Rubric below represents the standards of scoring. This means that it shows the most points scored given the criteria, but scores may vary given certain details of the assignment.

Rubric

Research Assignment 2 Rubric

Research Assignment 2 Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSection 1=4 QuestionsAnswer the Who, What, When, Where Aspects of Your Specific Article
20.0 pts

Excellent

Very Specific Information, Clear attention to detail, Setting and time frame helps reveal the character of the article before reading it.

 10.0 pts

Good

Attention to detail is there, but not specific enough. Certain Details are given, fairly vague.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeArticle OutlineOutline Reflecting the Details of the Work, Descending Order, Single-Spaced, Correct Formatting
30.0 pts

Excellent

Very good outline, correct formatting, attention to detail clearly reflected, outline is detailed, yet simple enough to convey a concise message. Thesis/Main Idea clearly evident from text and details on outline.

 20.0 pts

Good

Outline has good details, certain components are lacking, Main Idea is evident but not as clear as capable improvements can be made

 10.0 pts

Fair

Outline is presented in half page, meeting the requirements but components are vague, not many relevant details, Main Idea gets lost or missing altogether.

 0.0 pts

No Marks

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThesis /My InterpretationAuthor’s Given Thesis and Main Idea drawn from the Text with Details, Followed by Student’s Interpretation and Supporting Details
50.0 pts

Excellent

Authors Thesis and Main Idea is clearly stated in the text early, then expands through details and evidence from the text. Details are evident, showing the student read the article(s) and can discern with clarity the author’s argument and details. Next, Student’s interpretation reflects student’s clarity of the subject matter in making their argument. The student presents numerous examples and evidence to substantiate the claim.

 40.0 pts

Very Good

Author’s Thesis/Main Idea is clearly given with some evidence, but could see more going in. Student’s Interpretation is good but evidence to support can go farther.

 30.0 pts

Good

All components are there, Main/Idea Thesis is Given, Students’ Interpretation given but little evidence used to support, meeting just minimum requirements with no sign of clear, sophisticated knowledge from the article.

 15.0 pts

Fair

More than One Component is Missing, Little to no evidence is given, reflects some competence of material, but needs numerous improvements and reflects lack of research skills on a proficient level.

 5.0 pts

Poor

Does not meet basic requirements shows interpretations but does not go very far with it. Needs alot more work done to it, reflects little effort on student’s part.

50.0 pts

Total Points: 100.0

"Order a similar paper and get 15% discount on your first order with us
Use the following coupon
"FIRST15"

Order Now
You might also like
Create a 1,200-1,500-word safety plan for a client similar to Ted, who had been diagnosed with schizophrenia
Design a Toy
Writing the Intermediate Draft
Writing Assignment – Monophony to Polyphony
RE: SOCW6121 – Assignment: Human Trafficking (WK8)
Summarize the contributions
Reflection Paper on Class Material
writing response