Philosophy (not Psychology)

Essay Two PHIL101: Introduction to Philosophy 


In Section III of the course, we have considered the question of what constitutes rational belief in 

the context of religious belief. We have seen a variety of views relevant to both epistemic and 

pragmatic rational belief. Here’s a chart showing how the views that we’ve encountered stack up: 

Author Epistemically Rational? Pragmatically Rational? 

Aquinas Yes n/a1


Hick Not necessarily not2



 Traditional view: No 

Humanist view: Yes 

Traditional view: No 

Humanist view: Yes 


In order to solidify your understanding of these concepts, and to gain some practice in 

philosophical argumentation, your task is to write an argumentative essay drawing a conclusion 

about the rationality of religious belief. The primary resources for your discussion should be our 

authors in Section III. 


Do’s and Don’t’s: 

– Do make clear what is your thesis. Your thesis should be a claim about the rationality of 

religious belief. Note that this is not the same as making a claim about the existence of 

God, though obviously that matter may be related. Your focus should be on the criteria 

for rational belief and what it is rational believe. So: 

– Do make specific reference to the definition of rational belief from the Introduction to 

Section III (Lesson III.1). And further: 

– Do make clear whether you are talking about epistemic rationality or pragmatic 

rationality and apply the appropriate definition. Remember that the former concerns 

evidence for truth and the latter concerns the benefit (or harm) of belief. So, if you’re 

arguing about epistemic rationality, then your focus should be on evidence for or against 

God’s existence; and if you’re arguing about pragmatic rationality, then you should be 

talking about the benefits or harms of religious belief. 

– Do use our authors from this section. If you agree with one or more of them, then say 

why. Don’t simply assume that your author is correct: you must evaluate his thought. 

Similarly, if you disagree with one of our authors, then you must say why you think his 

thought incorrect. 

– Note, too, that our authors themselves don’t directly address the question of rational 

belief. You will have to consider what their remarks imply where rational belief is 


– Do explain yourself thoroughly to your reader. Don’t assume any specialized knowledge 

on the part of your reader. 

– I don’t recommend using other resources than those available in our textbook. – Don’t get carried away. Feelings tend to run strong where religious belief is concerned. 

Keep yours in check. 

– Remember, finally, that this is a writing exercise – not the final word on the matter. Keep 

your goals modest so that you can execute a clear, cohesive essay. 



– Due Monday, June 30, midnight, via 

– Maximum 750 words; include a word-count in your heading. 

– Double-spaced 

– Use proper in-text citation format 

– It’s a formal essay, so proper grammar, spelling, and tone, please. 










 n/a = the author’s remarks don’t address this question 2

 Hick seeks to show that the argument from evil fails to show that religious belief is epistemically 

irrational. His argument, if it succeeds, shows only that it is possible that the existence of evil is 

compatible with that of God. Hence, his argument shows not that religious belief is epistemically rational, 

but only that it might be. This is, still, a significant finding, given the intent of the argument from evil. 3

 And note that Feuerbach considered two views. The traditional view, he thinks, is both illogical and 

harmful to us, while the humanist view that he recommends, he thinks, is both logical and beneficial. 

"Order a similar paper and get 15% discount on your first order with us
Use the following coupon

Order Now